<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Skowronek.org &#187; Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skowronek.org/tag/support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skowronek.org</link>
	<description>The official web site for the Skowronek family of South Jordan, Utah, USA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing: The administrator has set policies to prevent this installation</title>
		<link>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/08/14/fixing-the-administrator-has-set-policies-to-prevent-this-installation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/08/14/fixing-the-administrator-has-set-policies-to-prevent-this-installation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Skowronek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off-Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skowronek.org/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently having a corrupted installer metabase can raise havoc with installing Microsoft software. This example relates to my attempt today to install my new laptop with all the relevant development tools to do my job, particularly MSXML6, and SQL Server 2005 management tools and references. However, the install continuously failed with the following error message, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently having a corrupted installer metabase can raise havoc with installing Microsoft software. This example relates to my attempt today to install my new laptop with all the relevant development tools to do my job, particularly MSXML6, and SQL Server 2005 management tools and references. However, the install continuously failed with the following error message, &#8220;The system administrator has set policies to prevent this installation&#8221;. Apparently, event though I&#8217;m a local administrator, I don&#8217;t have permissions to install this particular software. Funny, I swore I was a local administrator. Nonetheless, I spend an hour or so disabling antivirus, firewalls, and even logging in safe mode, to no avail.</p>
<p>So the fix to bypass this error, download and install the <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290301" target="_blank">Windows Installer CleanUp Utility</a> and remove all instances of the failed install attempts of MSXML and SQL Server components.</p>
<p>Viola, problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/08/14/fixing-the-administrator-has-set-policies-to-prevent-this-installation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Source OS vs Windows, A Cost Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/01/23/open-source-os-vs-windows-a-cost-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/01/23/open-source-os-vs-windows-a-cost-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Skowronek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skowronek.org/2008/01/23/open-source-os-vs-windows-a-cost-comparison/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was browsing tech articles today and ran across this comparison of Red Hat, Canonical [Ubuntu], and Windows. Now, before I begin on this brief but ever so relevant diatribe, let me preface my rant with the fact that I have been a regular user of various Linux flavors (Mandrake, Red Hat, Ubuntu, SUSE, Fedora, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was browsing tech articles today and ran across this comparison of <a href="http://www.redhat.com" target="_blank">Red Hat</a>, <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/" target="_blank">Canonical [Ubuntu]</a>, and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows" target="_blank">Windows</a>. Now, before I begin on this brief but ever so relevant diatribe, let me preface my rant with the fact that I have been a regular user of various Linux flavors (Mandrake, Red Hat, Ubuntu, SUSE, Fedora, etc.) since the late 1990&#8242;s, so though I am not a system administrator, I have a fair amount of Linux administration experience.</p>
<p>Over the past few years, when approached with the question of which OS one should run on their corporate network, I unwaveringly respond, &#8220;Windows XP&#8221; [of course]. The principle argument being that most small businesses cannot afford a full-time system administrator to administer a non-Windows network. It is nice to now have some numbers to support my argument. Keep in mind, I do not state one way or the other which OS is more secure, reliable, or robust. I only mention this for the simple fact that running a Windows based network, over the long run, will almost always be more affordable.</p>
<p><a href="http://saviorodrigues.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/compete-solely-on-price-no-thanks/" target="_blank">Compete solely on price, no thanks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/01/23/open-source-os-vs-windows-a-cost-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSDP Discovery Service on Port 5678</title>
		<link>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/01/09/high-network-traffic-caused-by-ssdp-discovery-service-on-port-5678/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/01/09/high-network-traffic-caused-by-ssdp-discovery-service-on-port-5678/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Skowronek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciTech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skowronek.org/2008/01/09/high-network-traffic-caused-by-ssdp-discovery-service-on-port-5678/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight, I arrived home hoping to jump right in to my &#8220;moonlighting&#8221; gig only to discover that an issue with my computer from this morning had persisted. For some reason, something, some application was causing a consistent amount of traffic (not large amounts of it mind you) across my local Ethernet connection. Fortunately for me, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight, I arrived home hoping to jump right in to my &#8220;moonlighting&#8221; gig only to discover that an issue with my computer from this morning had persisted. For some reason, something, some application was causing a consistent amount of traffic (not large amounts of it mind you) across my local Ethernet connection. Fortunately for me, I am somewhat tech savvy and thus commenced troubleshooting to discover the source rogue application.</p>
<p><span id="more-679"></span></p>
<h3>First off, sniff the TCP/UDP traffic</h3>
<p>After launching <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/677683af-3f5e-42ea-8116-9c92acd2c271.aspx" target="_blank">TCP Viewer</a> and letting it do its thing for a few seconds, I noticed that there was a group of three or so applications connecting and disconnecting in sequence, port scanning out my machine to my router on destination port 5678. Lo and behold, it ended up being the <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314056" target="_blank">svchost.exe</a> application. Not just one or two ports, but scanning tens if not hundreds if left to do its thing.</p>
<h3>Next, Find the Application and Kill It</h3>
<p>I launched <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/cb56073f-62a3-4ed8-9dd6-40c84cb9e2f5.aspx" target="_blank">Process Explorer</a> to try to figure out if svchost.exe was truly the offending thread. I then isolated the application with the same PID as the one reported in TCP Viewer (in my case 1324). Yep, svchost.exe. Right-click | Kill Application. Bye-bye. No more solid blinking lights across my gigabit Ethernet connection!</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Now you ask, what service or application would be sending and receiving such a high rate of packets (ultimately crashing my router due to the amount of hits it was getting)? Well, it turns out that the <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/323713" target="_blank">UPnP services</a> (which I had <em>assumed</em> I had disabled) were for some reason hanging on the requests to my router. All requests were headed to the router&#8217;s internal interface (10.0.0.1) on port 5678. From what I can tell, the router was either dropping the packets or not responding properly so the <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/323713" target="_blank">SSDP Discover Service</a> was scanning out ports to try to &#8220;do its thing&#8221;.</p>
<h3>Solution</h3>
<p>Launch the <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308423" target="_blank">local service manager</a>, stop, and then finally <strong>DISABLE</strong> the following services:</p>
<ul>
<li>Universal Plug and Play Device Host
<li>SSDP Discovery Service
</ul>
<p>I do not plan on going in to detail on what these services do, but suffice it to say, they are unnecessary and in this case, a pain in the behind. There are a bunch of other article on this topic, but there did not appear to be one detailing this exact scenario, so hopefully this helps someone else from having to spend hours troubleshooting.</p>
<p>Happy computing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skowronek.org/2008/01/09/high-network-traffic-caused-by-ssdp-discovery-service-on-port-5678/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

